Three dumpers have been standing idle for two hours. Nobody has noticed yet. Here is what happens next.
↓ Scroll to follow itWhat happens SightAgent sees three dumpers standing at the loading point — engines running, nobody working. Not “a vehicle detected.” Three dump trucks, idle, for two hours.
What happens It lands on the server, alongside the access-control log and the NEC4 contract already there. Nothing has left the site.
What happens Four trucks on a fourteen-minute cycle; the programme needs six at twelve. Today falls short before the shift has started — and there is still time to move the fleet.
What happens CompoundLM writes the redeployment instruction — which trucks, from where, to bring the cycle back to rate. With the telematics and the shortfall already attached. Not a draft prompt. An instruction.
What happens It reaches the Construction Manager. Not the whole project. Not a digest on Friday. The one person who can still move the fleet this morning.
What happens They read it, approve it, and two trucks are moved onto the cycle. The rate recovers inside the shift. A shortfall caught, not a shortfall explained tomorrow. background recommended — a person decided.
Did it hold? What worked feeds the next project.
CompoundHub measures — and the understanding gets better.
Telematics alone sees idle plant — but not the NEC clause that makes it recoverable. Drone survey alone sees volume moved — but not the programme claim it contradicts. A camera alone sees a bucket — but not the service drawing it is violating.
Every one of those feeds already sits on site, in a different system, owned by a different person, read by no one together.
Disagreement is attention. Agreement is assurance. Neither exists until something reads across them.
Everything needed to understand the project sits on the SiteRecorder, on site. The site does not stop understanding itself because a network link dropped.
Background recommends. People decide.
Your commercial platform, your planning tool, your document management, your telematics — they keep doing what they do well.
Background connects what they already know — and reaches the reality none of them can see.
Projects end. People move on. Knowledge is often lost with them.
Background helps organisations retain what worked, what didn’t, and what changed.
The result is not just better project visibility. It is stronger organisational memory.
Every feed in the chain above already exists on your sites. Walk one finding from the feeds that produced it to the person who acted on it.
Talk to us